Bob jones university dating policy
that it was within the scope of the First Amendment’s protections for religion for the IRS to revoke the tax exempt status for the university based on its policy prohibiting interracial dating…
The Supreme Court is clearly leaning toward a similar move here…
In fact these sectarian strategies become more than avoidance; they are, for Lewis, "courtly" in that BJU uses its public discourse to "woo" the secular "Other," ostensibly through conversion.
Such a sympathetic study should interest those of us who teach and work in a religious institution that, like BJU, tries to "romance" outsiders, often for similar purposes.
Bush made an early campaign stop at Bob Jones University, an institution that until that very year had prohibited its students from interracial dating.
The school's community had no idea his visit would thrust BJU into the national gaze, making it a scapegoat for public political anxieties.
In the process, he told the television audience that though he and his predecessors believed the ban had scriptural warrant, it was ultimately less important than freedom of religion and the overall evangelical message BJU wanted to convey to the secular world.
Under the case, which has already been touted by the left as the model for a federal case against same-sex marriage, universities will be considered discriminatory if they stand against same-sex marriage the same way Bob Jones University was with regard to its interracial dating standard.
Which means that they are regulated as common businesses under anti-discrimination law.
Which means they can be shut down or fined for failure to perform same-sex weddings. Which means we are a few years away from it happening.
Fourteen years ago, when Bob Jones University was under fire for its policy against interracial dating, the university made the same case.
The university explained its beliefs this way: [E]very effort man has made, or will make, to bring the world together in unity plays into the hand of Antichrist.